Rising costs for fossil fuels and the need to reduce emissions in the production of castings are subjecting foundries worldwide to increasing pressure to act and innovate. Due to fierce global competition in this sector and high investment costs for alternative technologies, foundries are therefore under high pressure to transform, while at the same time having limited financial resources.
This article examines the economic and environmental differences between a conventional industrial foundry process chain, a process chain based on a hydrogen (H2)-fired melting furnace and an all-electric approach using conversion of H2 to electricity within a solid oxide fuel cell.
To ensure an unbiased comparison of the process chains introduced, the respective mass efficiencies are first determined using an absorbing Markov chain before calculating the mass-specific costs and emissions of each approach using a literature-based process model. The comparison of the setups shows negligible differences in terms of material loss and cost in the respective best case. However, significantly higher emission minimums are found for both H2 approaches compared to the biogas-based conventional approach, especially for the use of green H2.
In summary, no significant economic disadvantages of the H2-based approaches can be identified. Even considering that the economic comparison is biased in favor of biogas due to accounting measures, the environmental difference is comparatively small. The results indicate that the conversion of the foundry industry towards more sustainable H2-based foundry process chains is in principle reasonable as well as affordable and should therefore be achieved in the medium term.
This article examines the economic and environmental differences between a conventional industrial foundry process chain, a process chain based on a hydrogen (H2)-fired melting furnace and an all-electric approach using conversion of H2 to electricity within a solid oxide fuel cell.
To ensure an unbiased comparison of the process chains introduced, the respective mass efficiencies are first determined using an absorbing Markov chain before calculating the mass-specific costs and emissions of each approach using a literature-based process model. The comparison of the setups shows negligible differences in terms of material loss and cost in the respective best case. However, significantly higher emission minimums are found for both H2 approaches compared to the biogas-based conventional approach, especially for the use of green H2.
In summary, no significant economic disadvantages of the H2-based approaches can be identified. Even considering that the economic comparison is biased in favor of biogas due to accounting measures, the environmental difference is comparatively small. The results indicate that the conversion of the foundry industry towards more sustainable H2-based foundry process chains is in principle reasonable as well as affordable and should therefore be achieved in the medium term.
